Pros: lunches, dinners, seminars, trips, contests, healthcare, support
Cons: cold atmosphere, among fellow brokers compared to paine webber
I was recruited to Merrill Lynch from Paine Webber in 1989. The amount of support from the home office was beyond compare. I learned quite an amount during the training in Princeton, New Jersey. The co-workers in Rochester were more autonomous than co-workers at Paine Webber in Rochester. However, there was more a feeling of being part of a team at
– more... Paine Webber. The culture in the Rochester office was cold in comparison. This was probably not the case in New York at Merrill Headquarters. Merrill Management was top notch. The hardest part of the job was the unfriendly atmosphere in my office. The most enjoyable part of the job were the rewards for a job well done. Merrill Lynch spared no expense to provide trips, gifts, and remuneration for being a good producer at the company. I have always regretted leaving Merrill Lynch. It was the best firm on the street, and the largest during my tenure there. I might have looked to make a change and try a career move inside the firm to a salaried job and outside of Rochester. The industry has changed since I left, and many firms are no longer in existence. However, Merrill Lynch is to my knowledge, still the top investment firm on wall street. I am very fortunate to have worked for such a great corporation. – less