Pros: good benefits and that;s about it
Cons: directors don't know how to manage people, lack of professionalism, hire many people with no pharmaceutical background
People are hired as managers and don't know how to manage, so they choose to not communicate with their Admins and I was told, 'a little fishing won't hurt." Meaning my manager did NOT want me to ask him for pertinent information regarding my job.
Instead, he ignored my emails regarding million dollar legal agreements and where he wanted them charged,
– more... so I had to "fish" and "guess" what cost center may be the correct one.
Also, I sat beside a woman much older than myself who got into screaming matches with 3 other Shire employees. When reported to HR, they "talked" to her and she's still there and everyone in the company hates working with her...go figure. I've worked for much more professional pharmacetucal companies (much larger than Shire) and their level of professionalism far exceeds Shire.....they don't tolerate screaming matches and hire PROFESSIONAL Managers/Directors, not ones who yell and scream at their Admins. – less
Employee1 – May 16, 2012
I worked thier for 4 years (since the Shire bought it's first Biotech). They provided no support as management, but where the first to blame you when things went wrong. It's great to be a Monday morning quarterback. They actually made everyone re-apply for thier jobs that they already had. Talk about serious ethics issues. The leadership is lacking. The biotech arm of the company (Lexington, Ma.) used to be great, until the Pharma side of the company got involved. Not worth the money.